I don't see actual data, but based on the posts I see, I can now state with almost complete certainty that the Dank Crypto Cabal is the most active group in the entire Lens ecosystem. We have a lot of memes, valuable analyses, good conversations and, predictions, interesting polls, and we continuously generate $GHO traffic through post collections and tips, AND even smaller users get traction and engagement.
This is a good example of how incentives work very well even on the smallest scale, boosting activity and leading to mutual engagement among users.
It would work well on a larger scale too, across all levels of the ecosystem, from the protocol to the clients.
- 30046 FOLLOWERS
- 270 FOLLOWING
- MEMBER OF 106 CLUBS
@justchaos is cooking something π
This was a very restrained post compared to how I actually feel. Seriously. Similar to the previous one, the next bull market won't be a 20-21-like overall run either, but rather an incredible pump of a handful of coins from 1-2 narratives while the rest will perish or get eaten up by inflation due to token unlocks. $ZEC will definitely be one of the few runners.
Looking at this chart, it very much looks like $ZEC has bottomed for the upcoming weeks, and even on the weakest days it's either producing the smallest pullback or going against the market. I wouldn't open a leverage long, but spot holding looks very comfy. I'm also holding a big bag of $CYPH stock.
Post should not be empty!
At some point, you will realize that feed algorithms serve one entity: the platform itself. By constantly placing content in front of you, it tricks you into making scrolling your hobby. Have you ever asked yourself whether you really need this scrolling?I have.I know who I want to follow, and I know whose opinion I trust. I also know how I want to organize their posts in my feed. And I don't need the platform to know what I want to see better than I do.Soon, I will step out of the Matrix using the least market-compatible solution.
Here we are. We might lose this level now and a more negative scenario than I outlined could follow, but if we manage to turn it back into a support, it's a good entry for a scalp between $4.6 and $5.4.$NEAR
I sat out of $NEAR for a while. It's really hard to do anything with this chart other than scalping between $4.6-5.4, which isn't really my thing. I'll wait until any concrete direction is validated, either down or up. If you're only going for spot buys these could be good entries. Sell under $4.6.
Looking at this chart, it very much looks like $ZEC has bottomed for the upcoming weeks, and even on the weakest days it's either producing the smallest pullback or going against the market. I wouldn't open a leverage long, but spot holding looks very comfy. I'm also holding a big bag of $CYPH stock.
Lens lately.
Just an example: yesterday's activity ordered by clients. 78% of the active accounts and 53% of the content shared is pure spam. This is a highly dysfunctional and unsustainable way of operating.I understand the approach that in this social context, transactions should be free from the user side, but even if it isn't apparent right now, with scaling it up to a level expected from larger-scale adoption, this would be unbelievably harmful.
This weekend I saw Lens from a new perspective, and I realized that Lens needs two things: 1) A decent and dynamic Lens score (the old one is no longer updating, as far as I can see) 2) A protocol-level barrier to avoid generating spam.
Blockchains solved this with fees (it is actually not worth spamming the system because it consumes all your money), unfortunately we also need to find a solution. As I see it, practically only the abuser's imagination sets the limit to how they spam the system, essentially for free.These two can basically be traced back to solving one problem: filtering out bots and low-activity/spam-like entities, both to prevent improper exploitation of the protocol and to improve user experience.
Entities invisible on clients also represent unnecessary data to process/filter and fake numbers. This cannot be solved simply by a client-side filter.
This weekend I saw Lens from a new perspective, and I realized that Lens needs two things: 1) A decent and dynamic Lens score (the old one is no longer updating, as far as I can see) 2) A protocol-level barrier to avoid generating spam.
Blockchains solved this with fees (it is actually not worth spamming the system because it consumes all your money), unfortunately we also need to find a solution. As I see it, practically only the abuser's imagination sets the limit to how they spam the system, essentially for free.These two can basically be traced back to solving one problem: filtering out bots and low-activity/spam-like entities, both to prevent improper exploitation of the protocol and to improve user experience.
Entities invisible on clients also represent unnecessary data to process/filter and fake numbers. This cannot be solved simply by a client-side filter.