@0xjavisoftware developer, ai engineer, looking for a team to joini just noticed, on @orb when tipping $pointless, it now shows the amount in $USD too, everywhere, super convenient and smooth!!! also when the tip happens, in the green indicator “corner of tips” on the post, it reflects the tip in USD too. so good and well thought!!! 👨🍳🤌15:31, 31 Jul 2026Posted from Orb10Reactions2Replies & Quotes
@sydney_bro$pointless founder and devIs GHO using layerzero protocol? If yes, can the bridge be generalized to allow all LZ tokens... For example $pointless? Same for UI for uniswap LP, can it be made available for other tokens?21:24, 23 Jul 2026Posted from Orb4Reactions5Replies & Quotes
@superluminalPart time crypto nerd, stealth meme handler, running enthusiast🔴Update: I spent some time today and went through the on-chain data. I pulled the full holder distribution across Base, Lens, zkSync and Polygon (using the top 10,000 addresses on Polygon as a structural baseline) to see what the $Pointless economy looks like. 📊 Here is where our 1 Trillion total supply sits today: **Polygon (Balances >5M)**: 2,408 wallets | 475.74 Billion tokens (47.6% of supply) **Polygon (Balances ≤5M)**: 115,000+ wallets | 383.22 Billion tokens (38.3% of supply) **Base (All holders)**: 116 wallets | 115.33 Billion tokens (11.5% of supply) **Lens (All holders)**: 506 wallets | 23.56 Billion tokens (2.4% of supply) **zkSync (All holders**): 12 wallets | 2.15 Billion tokens (0.2% of supply) My suspicion is that the ≤5M pool contains the heavy bot-cluster wallets. This is where a line could be drawn for a V2 migration filter. The downside, this cohort undoubtedly contains completely legitimate, smaller users or early Polygon community members who are just holding passively. 💡 Key Takeaways The Community Is Strong: If we group all wallets on Base, Lens, zkSync, and Polygon addresses holding strictly over 5M tokens, this group controls 616.78 Billion tokens—roughly 61.7% of the total supply. The Bot Overhead is smaller than I thought: While wallets holding exactly 5M tokens bloat our unique wallet metrics, economically they only represent a tiny 38.3% of the total supply. 🗺️ Conclusion & Discussion Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? A V2 migration that draws a line at ≤ 5M on Polygon would result in a 38.3% permanent supply burn. Given that the community safely holds nearly 62% of the project, do we still want to pursue the V2 migration overhead, or should we focus our energy on growing the V1 ecosystem?11:35, 14 Jul 2026Posted from Orb4Reactions3Replies & Quotes
@superluminalPart time crypto nerd, stealth meme handler, running enthusiast🔴 $Pointless - Hard truths and a proposal for a path forward Hey everyone, this is probably my longest post ever, but I want to take some time to address some economic hard truths about the $Pointless project. First of all, I think I can speak for all active $Pointless holders here when I say that we want to see the project and community prosper. Unfortunately though, I have reached the conclusion that under our current structure, it will be very hard to see that happen. 📜 The History: How We Got Here When $Pointless was first launched, the token distribution was done by a massive airdrop to 125,000 addresses on the Polygon chain. This was before Lens migrated to its own network. The reality is that estimates show only about 5,000 to 10,000 of those were actual Lens profiles. The remaining 110,000+ addresses were Sybil accounts and bots, with the vast majority of ordinary allocations sitting untouched at 5 million tokens per wallet. Currently, there is no usable exit liquidity on Polygon, so these tokens are effectively “trapped” for now. 💥 The Problem: What Blocks Us From Growing Economically The problem is that if we, as a community, add liquidity on Lens (e.g. adding to the ETH/$Pointless pool on Oku Trade), we run the massive risk of creating a "honey pot." The moment our pools get deep enough, thousands of dormant bots could wake up, bridge over from Polygon, drain the ETH reserves, and use our community as their exit liquidity. This structural overhang acts as a permanent ceiling on our price growth. To understand the sheer size of this overhang, consider the numbers: Polygon holds the total supply of 1 trillion tokens (minus what has been bridged out). Meanwhile, Lens has only 23.5 billion tokens bridged over, and Base has 108.8 billion. 💡 My Proposal: The $Pointless Evolution I think we as a community have to make a decision. Either we keep everything as is and agree that $Pointless will for a very long time remain economically “pointless”, a meme token with no value, or we choose to do something about it. My proposal is to discuss the opportunity of a token migration. We take a snapshot of active users and liquidity providers and airdrop a V2 Pointless token exclusively to these active community members after a set deadline. The old V1 supply (and the thousands of dormant bot wallets holding it on Polygon) will be completely left behind on the legacy contract. They will be permanently locked out, and the new V2 market cap will become 100% clean from day one. I know a V2 migration is a bold step and requires effort, but it ensures that future liquidity directly rewards the real people building this culture, not ghost wallets from years ago. I would love to hear what you all think about this idea! Let's discuss in the thread below 👇05:46, 12 Jul 2026Posted from Orb19Reactions19Replies & Quotes
@orbbroProduct Designer | Meme | Web3 Enthusiast | UI/UX audit 🌐💡Imagine waking up to $pointless at $1million market cap.08:36, 10 Jul 2026Posted from Orb8Reactions3Replies & Quotes
